{DON'T REPLY} [SUN] Question about interface hme0:1
2007-12-24 19:07:00
few days ago, then posted a summary. Now for some reason it is
going out again. Possibly because I addressed it to the old
*and* new list by accident.
In any case no need to reply.
Dave Foster
> From: David Foster <foster at dim.ucsd.edu>
> Subject: [SUN] Question about interface hme0:1
> To: sun-managers at ececs.uc.edu, codeprof at codeprof.com
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-MD5: OhijO8neAq903fpXBVcezw==
> X-BeenThere: codeprof at codeprof.com
> X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.1
> List-Help: <mailto:codeprof-request at codeprof.com?subject=help>
> List-Post: <mailto:codeprof at codeprof.com>
> List-Subscribe: <http://www.codeprof.com/execute/ask/?codeinfoid=838>,
<mailto:codeprof-request at codeprof.com?subject=subscribe>
> List-Id: The Sun Managers Mailing List <codeprof.codeprof.com>
> List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.codeprof.com/execute/ask/?codeinfoid=838>,
<mailto:codeprof-request at codeprof.com?subject=unsubscribe>
> List-Archive: <http://www.codeprof.com/pipermail/codeprof/>
> Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2001 11:31:29 -0800 (PST)
>
>
>
> Ok, I know in advance this is a stupid question, but I can't
> locate the answer.
>
> Can someone explain the hme0:1 interface entry below, on a
> Solaris 2.6 (E450) system? Running 'netstat -in' shows this
> interface has had no activity.
>
> As far as I can tell there should only be lo0 and hme0 on
> this machine.
>
> On our Solaris 2.6 system we have:
>
> ncmir:foster> ifconfig -a
> lo0: flags=849<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 8232
> inet 127.0.0.1 netmask ff000000
> hme0: flags=863<UP,BROADCAST,NOTRAILERS,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
> inet 132.239.16.23 netmask ffffff80 broadcast 132.239.16.127
> hme0:1: flags=842<BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
> inet 0.0.0.0 netmask 0
> ^^^^^^^ ^^^ ??
>
> On our Solaris 8 systems with IPv6 enabled we have:
>
> dim:foster> ifconfig -a
> lo0: flags=1000849<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv4> mtu 8232 index 1
> inet 127.0.0.1 netmask ff000000
> hme0: flags=1000843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv4> mtu 1500 index 2
> inet 132.239.16.7 netmask ffffff80 broadcast 132.239.16.127
> lo0: flags=2000849<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv6> mtu 8252 index 1
> inet6 ::1/128
> hme0: flags=2000841<UP,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv6> mtu 1500 index 2
> inet6 fe80::a00:20ff:fe9d:69b1/10
> hme0:1: flags=2080841<UP,RUNNING,MULTICAST,ADDRCONF,IPv6> mtu 1500 index 2
> inet6 3ffe:2807:fc02:fc01:a00:20ff:fe9d:69b1/64
>
> Again, I'm not sure what the hme0:1 entry is for, as it looks like
> both IPv4 and IPv6 are handled by hme0.
>
> Dave Foster
>
>
> << All opinions expressed are mine, not the University's -- duh >>
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> David Foster National Center for Microscopy and Imaging Research
> Programmer/Analyst University of California, San Diego
> dfoster at ucsd.edu Department of Neuroscience, Mail 0608
> (858) 534-4583 http://ncmir.ucsd.edu/
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> codeprof mailing list
> codeprof at codeprof.com
> http://www.codeprof.com/execute/ask/?codeinfoid=838
<< All opinions expressed are mine, not the University's -- duh >>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
David Foster National Center for Microscopy and Imaging Research
Programmer/Analyst University of California, San Diego
dfoster at ucsd.edu Department of Neuroscience, Mail 0608
(858) 534-4583 http://ncmir.ucsd.edu/
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Comments
Got something to say?
You must be logged in to post a comment.
